Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!jarthur!aqdata!sullivan
From: sullivan@aqdata.uucp (Michael T. Sullivan)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: preliminary call for disussion: rec.arts.movies subgroups
Message-ID: <1990Jan3.175530.26100@aqdata.uucp>
Date: 3 Jan 90 17:55:30 GMT
References: <500.259f456f@devsim.mdcbbs.com>
Organization: aQdata, Inc.  Western Region -- San Dimas, CA
Lines: 18

From article <500.259f456f@devsim.mdcbbs.com>, by jmi@devsim.mdcbbs.com (JM Ivler - MDC - Douglas Aircraft - Long Beach, CA):
> In article <1989Dec27.211218.18630@aqdata.uucp>, sullivan@aqdata.uucp (Michael T. Sullivan) writes:
>> 
>> If you want to reduce traffic, I think the only chance you have is
>> to split things up by genre (r.a.m.foreign-lang, r.a.m.horror, etc.).
> 
> Michael... NO!... Please... as an example of the confusion that this would lead 
> ...
> the same movie in the same genre. The idea looks good on paper... but when it 
> gets implimented it turns to trash. 

That sorta was my point, actually.  I meant that the "classic(al)" idea
was even worse than the genre idea, which is about the closest thing
to clearly defined as your going to get.
-- 
Michael Sullivan          uunet!jarthur.uucp!aqdata!sullivan
aQdata, Inc.
San Dimas, CA