Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caesar.cs.montana.edu!milton!gwangung
From: gwangung@milton.acs.washington.edu (Roger Tang)
Newsgroups: news.misc
Subject: Re: Fcc Regs/Data Comm.
Message-ID: <1211@milton.acs.washington.edu>
Date: 2 Jan 90 06:07:45 GMT
References: <31A.news.misc@pro-generic> <70194@looking.on.ca>
Reply-To: gwangung@milton.acs.washington.edu (Roger Tang)
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Lines: 12


	I agree with Brad.  It's premature to write letters since there
was no docket numbers, no actual hard evidence that the FCC is even
planning such modem surcharges.

	In fact, didn't I just read on the TELECOM digest that this whole
brouhaha is an inaccurate misunderstanding of the confirmation hearings
for the new FCC chief, and that he refered to "enhanced service" and not
even modem lines.....?

	At any rate, I think we need docket numbers and hard evidence of
intent before we launch a pre-emptive strike....