Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!novavax!twwells!bill
From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
Newsgroups: news.misc
Subject: Re: Articles most often cited in comp.all
Summary: yes, another flame
Keywords: flame
Message-ID: <1990Jan2.040804.9190@twwells.com>
Date: 2 Jan 90 04:08:04 GMT
References: <9224@elsie.UUCP> <6977@tank.uchicago.edu> <1989Dec30.234712.23184@twwells.com> <6984@tank.uchicago.edu>
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: None, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Lines: 47

In article <6984@tank.uchicago.edu> jill@tank.uchicago.edu (jill holly hansen) writes:
: In article <1989Dec30.234712.23184@twwells.com> bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) writes:
: :In article <6977@tank.uchicago.edu> jill@tank.uchicago.edu (jill holly hansen) writes:
: :: It is interesting, isn't it, that the compiler of this waste of
: :: net resources doesn't list his name.
: :
: :Enough!
: :
: :The guy chose to not list his name because of complaints from
: :turkeys like yourself.
: :
: :The whines about the report are far more objectionable than the
: :report could ever be. And, of course, said whines waste *far*
: :more bandwidth than the original posting.
: :
: :Shut up and go away.
: :
: :Followups have been directed to alt.flame
:
: Isn't it predictable how people with little to say always
: tell others to shut up?

Well, I certainly have had more to say that is worthwhile to hear
than you have. Let us compare the information in your response to
my message with the information in mine. Yours was contentless;
mine, at least, contributed two facts.

But then again, you chose not to deal with those facts, but
instead chose to respond with a sophomoric, and false, comment. We
can see how much respect you have for facts.

Your continuing complaining about that report is *worthless*.
Moreoever, it is obvious that you are ignorant of basic
net.knowledge: this is evident both from the content and style of
your messages.

Followups to this message have *also* been directed to alt.flame.
Newbie, that's a hint: it means that continued discussion on this
topic should not be continued in this newsgroup, as it has
degenerated into what is essentially name calling.

The only thing that would be appropriate for you to post further
would be an apology to the person you causelessly maligned.

---
Bill                    { uunet | novavax | ankh | sunvice } !twwells!bill
bill@twwells.com