Path: utzoo!censor!geac!alias!kpicott%alias@csri.utoronto.ca From: kpicott%alias@csri.utoronto.ca (Socrates) Newsgroups: ont.general Subject: Re: Sunday Shopping (Con) Message-ID: <692@alias.UUCP> Date: 22 Dec 89 15:04:45 GMT References: <1989Dec20.222459.21666@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> <65018@looking.on.ca> Sender: kpicott@alias.UUCP Reply-To: kpicott%alias@csri.utoronto.ca (Socrates) Distribution: ont Organization: Alias Research Inc. Lines: 34 In article <65018@looking.on.ca> brad@looking.on.ca (Brad Templeton) writes: >Do all these arguments justify the immense cost of the forced sunday >closing? Yes, that cost is high. > Actual that cost is imaginary. The dollar "cost" is nothing compared to the human cost of having no time for rest. In the business you and I are in we can pick and choose when we want to rest and when we want to redouble our efforts since we are task-oriented. The retail workers are hour-oriented. They only have time to give and money to gain. Here my prejudices show through in that money<I wonder how many people are dying in that traffic >to keep stores closed, if you want to ask the emotional question. > Their risk, if you want the cold logical answer. Toronto is a pathological case in regards to any of these issues. How many people are dying in the traffic to keep the stores and offices open during weekdays? Your priorities are capitalism and the efficient use of money. (As opposed to resources, since in real life if there were less parking lots, cashiers, etc.. there would be more stores.) My priority is trying to get people to take a look at how stupid they can all be sometimes and to open their eyes as to where they are going. For this reason the two opposing views can never agree on the issue at hand. Check out my previous article for an attempt at a compromise. -- Kevin Picott aka Socrates aka kpicott%alias@csri.toronto.edu Alias Research Inc. R+D Toronto, Ontario... like, downtown "There can be no offense where none is taken" - Japanese proverb