Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!mit-eddie!PAWL.RPI.EDU!kudla@PAWL.RPI.EDU
From: kudla@PAWL.RPI.EDU (Robert J. Kudla)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: Love And Anger
Message-ID: <|-G2W_@rpi.edu>
Date: 1 Jan 90 00:22:51 GMT
References: <8912270931.AA03247@world.std.com>
Sender: daemon@eddie.mit.edu (Mr Background)
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Lines: 33
Approved: nessus@eddie.mit.edu


>Interesting article.  I laughed until I stopped.

I, regretfully, have only seen the video once, and then only the last
thirty seconds of it. As a result, I thought it was supposed to be
Kate making a covert parody of American rock videos. I am glad to see
that I was somewhat right....

One thing though.

>There are some damn good dancers in the video market today.  Of
>course, they are all uniformly terrible
>singers/songwriters/producers.  Janet Jackson, Paula Abdul and
>Madonna all spring (repulsively) to mind.
 ^^^^^^^

Now, the other two are more or less horrible and even Madonna's no
Kate when it comes to songwriting department, but I think she deserves
a bit better of an adjective than "repulsive". I even sort of like her
last album.

I haven't the foggiest idea, however, where you got the notion that
she can dance. She can writhe much as I do when I wake up feeling
particularly uninspired to face the world, and do it on many surfaces
such as concrete or astroturf, but she can't *dance*.

Anyway, back to Our Lady and the world at hand.
-- 
Robert Jude Kudla  <kudla@pawl.rpi.edu>

"Famous? I'm not famous. People come up to me after a show and say
    'Hey, Steve!'"
                                -Jon Anderson