Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!caesar.cs.montana.edu!ogicse!blake!wiml
From: wiml@blake.acs.washington.edu (William Lewis)
Newsgroups: sci.space
Subject: Re: New years eve 1999
Summary: The obvious solution
Message-ID: <5140@blake.acs.washington.edu>
Date: 22 Dec 89 07:52:26 GMT
References: <2925@munnari.oz.au>
Reply-To: wiml@blake.acs.washington.edu (William Lewis)
Followup-To: sci.space
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Lines: 19

In article <2925@munnari.oz.au> dnk@munmurra.UUCP (David Kinny) writes:
>Again the same stupid claims are being advanced that the end of the
>century/millenium is at the end of the year 2000.  This is ludicrous !
   [...]
>that differ only in the last 1/2/3 digits.  I know when I'll be
>celebrating the New Year's Eve party of the millenium.  Hands up all
>those clods who are going to be a year late.

   Well, there is an obvious solution to this. I'm going to be celebrating
on the boundary between this millennium and the next... to avoid confusion,
I will get the best of both worlds, and simply celebrate all year long
in the year 2000. 
   A little impractical, perhaps, but... hmmm...

    --- phelliax the celebrant


-- 
wiml@blake.acs.washington.edu        (206)526-5885      Seattle, Washington