Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!RESEARCH!PRESOTTO
From: presotto@RESEARCH.ATT.COM
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.frac-l
Subject: FRAC-L's reply addresses.
Message-ID: <9001121916.AA29578@cwjcc.INS.CWRU.Edu>
Date: 12 Jan 90 15:11:00 GMT
Sender: 'FRACTAL' discussion list <FRAC-L@GITVM1>
Reply-To: 'FRACTAL' discussion list <FRAC-L@GITVM1>
Lines: 9
Approved: NETNEWS@PSUVM Gateway
Return-Path: <presotto@research.att.com>
X-To:         gitvm1.gatech.edu!FRAC-L@cwjcc.ins.cwru.edu,
              gitvm1.gatech.edu!postmaster@cwjcc.ins.cwru.edu

All the addresses in FRAC-L messages to which we might send bounces seem
to be the same as the mailing list itself.  We have stopped acting as a gateway
to AT&T and are returning mail that is addressed through us to other parts
of AT&T.  However, the bounced mail seems to come back again via the mailing
list.

I will put a filter on our mail bouncer to circumvent the problem.  However,
the reply addresses to this mailing list should be other than the submission
address.