Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!csinc!rpeglar
From: rpeglar@csinc.UUCP (Rob Peglar x615)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Here are five counterexamples
Summary: OK, but...
Message-ID: <161@csinc.UUCP>
Date: 10 Jan 90 20:24:48 GMT
References: <143@daedalus.nsc.com> <34315@mips.mips.COM>
Organization: Control Systems, Inc., St. Paul MN
Lines: 41

In article <34315@mips.mips.COM>, mark@mips.COM (Mark G. Johnson) writes:

> What about the following US semi equipment vendors?
> 
>        GCA           Wafer steppers including g- and i-line lenses
>        Ultratech     Wafer steppers    "
>        Genus         Silicide
>        LAM           etchers
>        Varian        e-beam reticle machines ("eEBES"), also ion implanters
>        Nanoline      in-situ film thickness monitors
>        Teradyne      Laser fuse-blowing for DRAM redundancy implementation
>                      (performed in the clean room between M2 and passivation)
>                      (note: major market for these is in Japan)
>        Applied Materials  Epitaxy reactors
> 
> 
> There are dozens and dozens more; these are just a handful.
> -- 
>  -- Mark Johnson	

Mark is right, of course.  However...

1)  Large asian conglomerates could buy these companies out in an instant.
If Nikon can buy P-E,....   

2)  The way US business law is written (esp. Delaware law), the companies
have little defense against a 2 or 3x share price buyout.  Big players
can easily afford this.  

3)  The way US Congress acts, US business law will not change soon.

4)  The way US Do[CDEL...] act, there will be no push to disallow certain
technologies from foreign ownership.  Assuming foreign ownership is bad,
of course.  Is it?

Rob
-- 
Rob Peglar	Control Systems, Inc.	2675 Patton Rd., St. Paul MN 55113
...uunet!csinc!rpeglar		612-631-7800

The posting above does not necessarily represent the policies of my employer.