Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:24984 comp.lang.c++:6058
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!decwrl!ogicse!emory!hubcap!ncrcae!ncrlnk!wright!thor.wright.edu
From: econrad@thor.wright.edu (Eric Conrad)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: machine generated code and chatty compilers
Message-ID: <923@thor.wright.EDU>
Date: 9 Jan 90 18:07:20 GMT
References: <1471@mdbs.UUCP>
Sender: news@wright.EDU
Reply-To: econrad@thor.wright.edu
Followup-To: comp.lang.c
Lines: 14

From article <1471@mdbs.UUCP>, by wsmith@mdbs.UUCP (Bill Smith):
> For those helpful souls that wish their C or C++ compiler to generate
> helpful warning messages in contexts that are technically correct, I 
> have another argument that that is inherently a bad idea.
> 
> People are not the only entities that generate code for C or C++ compilers.

So turn the warning suppression flag on for automatic-generated code.

-- Eric Conrad
+----------------------------------------------------------+
| Eric Conrad - Wright State University                    |
| "Progress was all right once, but it went on too long."  |
+----------------------------------------------------------+