Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!ames!ncar!unmvax!bbx!bbxsda!scott
From: scott@bbxsda.UUCP (Scott Amspoker)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Compilers and programming style (was Re: A question of style)
Message-ID: <534@bbxsda.UUCP>
Date: 8 Jan 90 23:09:31 GMT
References: <1989Dec22.100135.2903@gdt.bath.ac.uk> <4367@rtech.rtech.com> <1989Dec31.153241.16479@gdt.bath.ac.uk> <649@codonics.COM> <1990Jan5.100042.26760@gdt.bath.ac.uk> <2283@dataio.Data-IO.COM>
Reply-To: scott@bbxsda.UUCP (Scott Amspoker)
Organization: Basis International,  Albuquerque, NM
Lines: 13

In article <2283@dataio.Data-IO.COM> bright@dataio.Data-IO.COM (Walter Bright) writes:
>volatile int *p;
>*p;		/* has side effects and must not be optimized away	*/

Just curious - what kind of code should be generated for the above
C fragment?


-- 
Scott Amspoker
Basis International, Albuquerque, NM
(505) 345-5232
unmvax.cs.unm.edu!bbx!bbxsda!scott