Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!unido!tub!tubopal!ripley
From: ripley@tubopal.UUCP (Hans-Ch. Eckert)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: Forth window system interface
Message-ID: <811@opal.tubopal.UUCP>
Date: 8 Jan 90 12:57:42 GMT
References: <8912291429.AA16742@jade.berkeley.edu> <1990Jan4.024907.29864@tree.uucp> <1990Jan5.113915.18626@cs.eur.nl>
Reply-To: ripley@tubopal.UUCP (Hans-Ch. Eckert)
Organization: Technical University of Berlin, Germany
Lines: 16

In article <1990Jan5.113915.18626@cs.eur.nl> henk@cs.eur.nl (Henk Langeveld) writes:
]What to think of 'vi', with forth as built-in extension language, as in
]Emacs ?  Or am I just dreaming ?
I've seen Emacs-clones written in Forth (I got a copy of Forthmacs for the ST
some days ago), and a friend of mine has developed a complete Forth-system
(including editor, cli and even more). Why not a vi-clone ?
Surely it is possible, so somebody just DO it !

Greetings,
				RIPLEY

-- 
Greetings from RIPLEY | UUCP: ripley@tubopal.UUCP (ripley@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de)
Hans-Christian Eckert |         ...!unido!tub!opal!ripley (Europe) 
D-1000 Berlin 30      |         ...!pyramid!tub!opal!ripley (World)
Regensburger Str. 2   | BITNET: ripley%tubopal@DB0TUI11.BITNET (saves $$$)