Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!execu!sequoia!rpp386!woody From: woody@rpp386.cactus.org (Woodrow Baker) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: The Woody and Amanda show continues... Summary: th Message-ID: <17583@rpp386.cactus.org> Date: 7 Jan 90 03:17:36 GMT References: <4386@amelia.nas.nasa.gov> <17544@rpp386.cactus.org> <1686@intercon.com> Organization: River Parishes Programming, Plano, TX Lines: 51 In the interest of brevity, and ease, I've started a new message block here. The comments refered to here, can be found in the other post with the subject The Woody and Amanda show. First, QMS didnot do the NEC890. That is a NEC printer. Second, 8 bit transparent i/o should be allowed. I don't have any problem with permitting it by a special switch setting, or even a software switch setting, but it should be there for you when needed. Thirdly Adobe totaly controls what goes on the rom. QMS cannot even look at it, using a dissasembler without violating thier contract. The way it works, or at least USED to work, is that the OEM would specify the address of the i/o port hardware, and the hardware specific stuff. Adobe would then generate a version of PS for them, complete with the printer specific stuff, and send them a set of master roms. This was the way it was explained to me. QMS didnot write either the emulators, or the paralell code. They were furnished by Adobe. QMS has had many years of experience with printer emulators. Any emulation that they did would be a LOT better than the Adobe implementations of the HP and DIABLO emulators. I know this, because they had no knowlege of things that they would have if they had written these. In addition, conversations with Adobe confirmed the fact that they did the emulators. In addition, QMS did not write the centronics drivers. If they had, they certainly would not have made them available to Apple, but there they are. The DIABLO emulator is far from complete. The HPLJ emulator does NOT behave like the HP. Specifically, if you tell a true HP that there are 66 lines per inch, it will do 6 lines per inch. The emulator in the Adobe printers will happily do 66 lines per inch. Looks wild. The HPGL emulator gets lost on certain commands. I realize that your areas of work and my areas of work are vastly different in regard to Postscript. I have used it in a production enviornment doing the typesetting for a local penny-shopper type rag of 16-20 pages. I did all of the layout, and typesetting for it, for about a 3 month period. I know how it impacts work schedules. Superexec seems to exist on versions above 41. So yes, it is not on all printers. The ones that it is on, however, allow you to understand more about the earlier ones. Your code is most interesting and useful. Thanks. Cheers Woody