Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!microsoft!jimad
From: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (JAMES ADCOCK)
Newsgroups: comp.object
Subject: Re: Evaluating "Object-Oriented" Programming Languages
Keywords: object-oriented, programming languages, evaluation, bibliography
Message-ID: <10161@microsoft.UUCP>
Date: 5 Jan 90 18:45:10 GMT
References: <638@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu> <10132@microsoft.UUCP> <2626@tukki.jyu.fi> <10157@microsoft.UUCP>
Reply-To: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (JAMES ADCOCK)
Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA
Lines: 7

Also, add to my list of pragmatic wanna-knows:

-> Specify representative compilations speeds in lines per second.  Include
   link times in this computation if your language has a separate link
   phase.  And if your language supports incremental compilation, publish
   separate indicative performance results for the incremental compiling
   mode, and for traditional "recompile-the-world" global builds.