Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!microsoft!jimad
From: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (JAMES ADCOCK)
Newsgroups: comp.object
Subject: Re: Evaluating "Object-Oriented" Programming Languages
Keywords: object-oriented, programming languages, evaluation, bibliography
Message-ID: <10176@microsoft.UUCP>
Date: 8 Jan 90 17:49:45 GMT
References: <638@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu> <706@cui.unige.ch> <644@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (JAMES ADCOCK)
Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA
Lines: 4

Can you please choose some other discriptor rather than
"ad hoc polymorphism" ???  This term is not descriptive, is being
applied to a technique that is certainly *not* "ad hoc," and sounds like it
is intended to be prejudicial terminology -- which I'm sure was not your intent!