Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!math.lsa.umich.edu!emv
From: emv@math.lsa.umich.edu (Edward Vielmetti)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs
Subject: Re: comp.periphs.scsi ? a modest proposal.
Message-ID: <EMV.90Jan12173216@urania.math.lsa.umich.edu>
Date: 12 Jan 90 22:32:16 GMT
References: <EMV.90Jan11030702@urania.math.lsa.umich.edu>
	<1467@umigw.MIAMI.EDU>
Sender: news@math.lsa.umich.edu
Organization: University of Michigan Math Dept., Ann Arbor MI.
Lines: 20
In-reply-to: jpb@umbio.miami.edu's message of 12 Jan 90 20:11:45 GMT

In article <1467@umigw.MIAMI.EDU> jpb@umbio.miami.edu (Joe Block) writes:

   I vote for comp.periphs.scsi.

thanks for the sentiment, but there's no vote yet... you'll
hear about that when the time comes.

I suppose I should emphasize that this is *not* a discussion to
split comp.periphs, but a discussion regarding a new group with
will draw some of its intended audience from comp.periphs but
also from comp.sys.sun, comp.sys.dec, comp.sys.mac.hardware,
comp.sys.hp (i.e. traditional hardware interface questions) as
well as comp.unix.ultrix, comp.unix.questions (software interface
and configuration questions) plus comp.arch and other theoretical
and futures aspects of scsi.  

Still coming up with the list of groups that the initial
call should be x-posted to, I think this covers it pretty well.

--Ed