Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!murtoa.cs.mu.oz.au!murdu!ucsvc!ltu!tsplc From: TSPLC@latvax8.lat.oz (Anjin_San, Hatamoto to Lord Toronaga) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Flicker nixer? Message-ID: <311@latvax8.lat.oz> Date: 6 Jan 90 19:09:04 GMT References: <978@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca> Organization: VAX Cluster, Computer Centre, La Trobe University Lines: 33 G'day, In article <978@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca>, lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips) writes: > In <575@sagpd1.UUCP>, monty@sagpd1.UUCP (Monty Saine) writes: >>In article portuesi@sgi.com (Michael Portuesi) writes: >> If so, are not the A500 and A2000 Denise's a different form/factor >> then the A1000? > > no.. same chip, exactly. > > -larry > > -- > "Cavett Emptor - Let the talk show host beware!" - Evan Marcus > +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | // Larry Phillips | > | \X/ lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca -or- uunet!van-bc!lpami!lphillips | > | COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322 -or- 76703.4322@compuserve.com | > +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ will it be okay to use the new Super Denise in an Amiga 1000 _without_ the new Super Agnus chip? That is does Super Denise have a dependency on Super Agnus in any way? If not, which new features of the Super Denise chip will be available to Amiga 1000 users that upgrade to the Super Denise chip? {Apologies for less content than the included text, however someone may want Larry's mail address. Perhaps I should have queried you via mail Larry, however the answers could be of interest to others.} yours truly, Lou Cavallo {with greetings from Down Under! :-)}.