Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!apple!agate!saturn!helios!terry
From: terry@helios.ucsc.edu (Terry Ricketts)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Split Decision - Ami WP
Message-ID: <10247@saturn.ucsc.edu>
Date: 9 Jan 90 23:06:51 GMT
References: <90008.165456JKT100@PSUVM.BITNET>
Sender: usenet@saturn.ucsc.edu
Reply-To: terry@helios.ucsc.edu (Terry Ricketts)
Organization: UCO/Lick Observatory, Santa Cruz
Lines: 14

In article <90008.165456JKT100@PSUVM.BITNET> JKT100@PSUVM.BITNET (JKT) writes:
>Both the most recent INFO and AmigaWorld, they compare Pen Pal and
>ProWrite 2.5.   INFO gave Pen Pal much higher ratings than ProWrite,
>while AmigaWorld said that ProWrite was better.
>
>I'd like opinions on which of these 2 reviews is more accurate and
>reputable.  I can't believe both of them, or can I?  Whose advice
>should I heed?

	Each reviewer has his own opinion. You have to judge by what info they
rated each by, & how much you trust the magazine and/or reviewer.
	IMHO I would trust Info before I would trust Amigaworld. But then
that is MY opinion isn't it. I have Pen-Pal & like it. I do not have
Prowrite and can not judge it, but from what I have heard it is slow.