Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!pollux.usc.edu!papa
From: papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: C-Ltd
Message-ID: <22253@usc.edu>
Date: 11 Jan 90 22:45:22 GMT
References: <13958@oregon.uoregon.edu>
Sender: news@usc.edu
Distribution: usa
Organization: Felsina Software, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 15

In article <13958@oregon.uoregon.edu> GPOTTS@oregon.uoregon.edu (Geoffrey Potts) writes:
|In the Feb. 1990 issue of AmigaWorld, at the back, they have a fine-print
|listing of companies that they recommend you not do business with. I do not
|know how they make this judgement (perhaps advertizing bills not paid?), but
				             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>they state that C-Ltd is no longer a viable company.

It is usually two things: unpaid ads (as you mention) and complaints from
customers that responded to ads or What's New announcements.  I am not
speking for AmigaWorld. Just referring what is standard practice.

-- Marco
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
"Xerox sues somebody for copying?" -- David Letterman
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=