Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!unido!laura!klute@trillian
From: klute@trillian
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: LHARC takes over?  Sure hope not!
Keywords: Ack!  Pffft!
Message-ID: <1866@laura.UUCP>
Date: 4 Jan 90 11:51:50 GMT
References: <6716@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV> <1860@laura.UUCP> <1363@atha.AthabascaU.CA>
Sender: news@laura.UUCP
Reply-To: klute@heike.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (Rainer Klute)
Organization: University of Dortmund, W-Germany
Lines: 25

Path: trillian
!klute

In article <1363@atha.AthabascaU.CA> rwa@cs.AthabascaU.CA (Ross Alexander) writes:
>Arcgsh is the best reason I have ever had to install a shell (gulam,
>msh, any keyboard oriented line-at-a-time shell at all).  Yes, I was
>using 2.1 and IMHO it's at least 5 times as much work to use as the
>raw commands themselves.  Faugh!

Depends on what you like and what you do not like. Surely
Arcgsh is nothing for people who like command line shells and
are able to remember all the options a program has, and
especially Zoo has *many* of them.

Arcgsh was designed for people who 1) like GEM or 2) do not
want to remember all commands and options of Zoo, Arc etc. in
order to keep their heads free for more important things.

If you like to use Arcgsh in general but do not like details of
user guiding please mail me you suggestions!

  Dipl.-Inform. Rainer Klute      klute@heike.informatik.uni-dortmund.de
  Univ. Dortmund, IRB             klute@unido.uucp, klute@unido.bitnet
  Postfach 500500         |)|/    ...uunet!mcvax!unido!klute
D-4600 Dortmund 50        |\|\    Tel.: +49 231 755-4663