Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:46911 comp.sys.atari.st:23603
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!sml108
From: SML108@PSUVM.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Genlock inquiry
Message-ID: <90006.203352SML108@PSUVM.BITNET>
Date: 7 Jan 90 01:33:52 GMT
References: <678@alias.UUCP> <3228@lmrc.uucp> <90006.120601JKT100@PSUVM.BITNET>
Organization: Penn State University
Lines: 26

In article <90006.120601JKT100@PSUVM.BITNET>, JKT <JKT100@PSUVM.BITNET> says:
>
>In article <678@alias.UUCP>, rhardock@alias.UUCP (Ron Hardock) writes:
>>
>> I am also unsure of what computer platform to choose.
>> Beside the Amiga, other choices I can see are:
>> - Atari STE/TT        (provides a color palette of 4096),
>> - Atari ATW   (provides 16 million simultaneous colors),
>
>Maybe, but just take one look at the tiny amount of software that
>supports this hardware when compared the the rapidly growing Amiga
>libaries, and you might change your mind rather quickly.  :-)
>
Sheesh, another commode head.  When are you guys going to realize
that Apple is the enemy, with the lion's share of the pie, whilst
you split hairs over the crumbs?  Pointlessly for your information,
there has been an EXCELLENT line of gen-lock software available
for three years now.  Yeah the amiga's a little better, but it
costs more too.  In fact, at the price of the 2000 fully equipped,
I'd put out the rest of my non-existent wad and buy security with
the Mac II.
  I develop on both machines....  They're both great, but neither
one is better overall.  All I know is that PC's suck, period. :)
Too bad you can make such a killing off them though...

Scott Le Grand  "If you like peanuts, you'll LOVE Sci-Fi!"