Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!prls!pyramid!infmx!aland From: aland@infmx.UUCP (Dr. Scump) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Re^2: Something else you can't do on the Mac Message-ID: <2988@infmx.UUCP> Date: 4 Jan 90 08:43:39 GMT References: <1284@marlin.NOSC.MIL> <970@v7fs1.UUCP> <129727@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <2702@aecom.yu.edu> <519@tci.bell-atl.com> Reply-To: aland@infmx.UUCP (alan denney) Organization: INFORMIX Professional Services ("Peace thru Normalization") Lines: 29 In article <519@tci.bell-atl.com> kempf@tci.bell-atl.com (Cory Kempf) writes: > ... >If you are going to post examples to "Prove" that a machine with a 16 >bit processor, a 640kB limit on RAM and a 32MB disk size limit is >better than a system with a 32 bit processor, capable of fully using >32 MB of RAM, and a 4GB disk size limit, at least try to come up with OK, I'll bite: How do you fit 4 GB of disk in a Mac? Where does this Mac with 4 GB of disk (even external disk) reside? I'd like to see it. What is it hooked up to, an IBM 3380? >reasonable examples. >Cory Kempf Technology Concepts phone: (508) 443-7311 x341 Perfect example of what I was just talking about. Every damn limit that you are babbling about here has NOTHING to do with PC architecture. I am setting up PCs now with 24 MB (easily expandable to 40MB), 600 MB of internal disk, and support for 20 users (easily), all for about the price of a fully-loaded single-user Mac IIci. Get with the '90s, pal. Or even the late '80s. -- Alan S. Denney @ Informix Software, Inc. "We're homeward bound {pyramid|uunet}!infmx!aland ('tis a damn fine sound!) -------------------------------------------- with a good ship, taut & free Disclaimer: These opinions are mine alone. We don't give a damn, If I am caught or killed, the secretary when we drink our rum will disavow any knowledge of my actions. with the girls of old Maui."