Xref: utzoo news.groups:16132 comp.sys.ibm.pc:41252
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen
From: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: comp.sys.ibm.pc.{tech,programmer,...}
Message-ID: <384@sixhub.UUCP>
Date: 5 Jan 90 00:31:35 GMT
References: <:EXZGDny2@ficc.uu.net> <25A26459.27214@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca> <376@sixhub.UUCP> <71634@looking.on.ca>
Reply-To: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: *IX Public Access UNIX, Schenectady NY
Lines: 23

In article <71634@looking.on.ca> brad@looking.on.ca (Brad Templeton) writes:

| If I end up being that volunteer, my preliminary list would look like
| 			hardware
| 				display
| 				mass storage
| 			software
| 				development
| 			industry
| 			communications
| 

  Where would all the questions about interrupts, ethernet, optical
disk, serial ports, etc, go? I think the idea of just a small split at
first would serve us best, to put the hardware, low level software
(bypass DOS), and msdos stuff into three groups.

  And I'm not offering to be czar.
-- 
	bill davidsen - sysop *IX BBS and Public Access UNIX
davidsen@sixhub.uucp		...!uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen

"Getting old is bad, but it beats the hell out of the alternative" -anon