Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!samsung!shadooby!yale!husc6!encore!pinocchio!peralta
From: peralta@pinocchio.Encore.COM (Rick Peralta)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: fcntl/socket anomaly
Summary: Why isn't ESRCH returned in fcntl(2) F_SETOWN on a socket
Keywords: obscure behavior
Message-ID: <10763@encore.Encore.COM>
Date: 28 Dec 89 20:37:34 GMT
Sender: news@Encore.COM
Reply-To: peralta@encore.com (Rick Peralta)
Organization: Encore Computer Corp, Marlboro, MA
Lines: 7

[ode to old bugs...]

Why when setting the F_SETOWN on a socket a pfind is not done on the PID?
Maybe more to the point, why the double standard on how a pgrp is specified?


 - Rick