Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU!rws
From: rws@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Bob Scheifler)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: conflicting types for size_t
Message-ID: <9001082225.AA01547@expire.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: 8 Jan 90 22:24:56 GMT
References: <2534@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov>
Sender: daemon@athena.mit.edu (Mr Background)
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 7


    Anyone have any ideas?

Are you sure you're passing -DNOSTDHDRS to gcc?

Why don't you just try using Sun's cc for now?  Does anyone really have
evidence that gcc on the sparc gives a significant performance increase?