Xref: utzoo comp.editors:1251 gnu.emacs:2112 comp.unix.wizards:20062 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!shelby!neon!Gang-of-Four!weening From: weening@Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU (Joe Weening) Newsgroups: comp.editors,gnu.emacs,comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: GNU Emacs, memory usage, releasing Message-ID: Date: 8 Jan 90 21:56:27 GMT References: <1558@aber-cs.UUCP> <1025@uc.msc.umn.edu> <1060@uc.msc.umn.edu> Sender: news@Neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System) Followup-To: comp.editors Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University Lines: 18 In-Reply-To: fin@uh.msc.umn.edu's message of 8 Jan 90 16:48:15 GMT I'm posting this message to help RMS's desire to remove the discussion of editor implementation methods from gnu.emacs. The discussion is currently going on in comp.editors, gnu.emacs and comp.unix.wizards. Therefore not everyone contributing to the discussion may have seen RMS's messages. The discussion is appropriate for comp.editors, so that's where I'm directing followups to this message. It is not appropriate for gnu.emacs, since that group is meant for short announcements only. It is not at all appropriate for comp.unix.wizards and should never have been posted there. Please, everyone, let's move this discussion to comp.editors only. If you want to continue reading it, subscribe to that newsgroup. -- Joe Weening Computer Science Dept. weening@Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU Stanford University