Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!sco!davidbe From: davidbe@sco.COM (The Cat in the Hat) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: CALL FOR VOTES: talk.lists Message-ID: <1235@scorn.sco.COM> Date: 10 Jan 90 20:16:02 GMT References: <1090@scorn.sco.COM> <356@dbase.UUCP> Sender: news@sco.COM Reply-To: davidbe@sco.COM (The Cat in the Hat) Organization: The Sixty Clever Orators Lines: 35 She said that he said that she said that dveditz@dbase.A-T.com (Dan Veditz) said: -I missed the discussion, so I'll stick in my tuppence now: - -1. This group will not divert any significant amount of traffic from the - groups that are currently bothered by them. It will, however, make - a good crossposting magnet. Actually, I think while there may be some initial crossposting, once the group gets going, people will start saying "Take it to talk.lists" and not crosspost. This may be a bit optomistic, but stranger things have happened. -2. This group is out of place as a "talk" group -- misc.lists would be a - much better name. (I realize you can't change the name during the vote - without causing apoplectic spasms in all net.police.self-appointed, - but next time give it a thought.) I considered misc.lists for a while, but feel that it would have the wrong flavor in the misc.* hierarchy. I see talk being for groups "full of sound and fury signifying nothing." The politics groups are an example of this. Misc, on the other hand is more informative, less inflamatory. You rarely see flame wars in the *.jobs.* groups. I just didn't think collections of various lists was lofty enough for the misc hierarchy. And, anyway, misc.lists doesn't roll off my tongue as nicely as talk.lists does, either. :-) -- David Bedno, Systems Administrator, The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. Email: davidbe@sco.COM / ..!{uunet,sun,ucbvax!ucscc,gorn}!sco!davidbe Phone: 408-425-7222 x5123 Disclaimer: Speaking from SCO but not for SCO. Is talk.lists a good idea? Is talk.lists a bad idea? mail yesvote@sco.COM Vote ends 2/5 mail novote@sco.COM