Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!alberta!ccu!jcoper
From: jcoper@ccu.umanitoba.ca
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: REVISED CHARTER for rec.arts.cinema
Message-ID: <1990Jan10.120337.1893@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
Date: 10 Jan 90 12:03:37 GMT
References: <7261@shlump.nac.dec.com> <512.25a7b6dd@devsim.mdcbbs.com>
Reply-To: jcoper@ccu.UManitoba.CA (D. Joseph Creighton)
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Lines: 19

>} One issue not covered is whether made-for-television (including
>} made-for-cable) films are included.
>} [...] would argue that made-for-television films [...] belong in
>} rec.arts.cinema and r.a.m(.r).
> 
>  (info on Buck Rogers movie hit/ television series failure deleted...)
>
>Would discussion of this fall into R.A.C or R.A.TV ? If there was ever a fine
>line, I think that this is an example of one. This definitely firms my resolve
>on moderation, but would the moderator permit this? Does this belong?
>   
But isn't the whole point of unmoderated groups the open discussion (however
redundant)?  I believe that both options should exist for the network user...
Let those who want their chatter "cleaned up" frequent the moderated groups,
and those who enjoy "the banter", read from those that are not.

Hailing Frequencies Closed.
"Captain" D. Joseph Creighton
*******************************************************************************