Xref: utzoo news.groups:16292 rec.arts.movies:28326
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!bellcore!texbell!vector!attctc!rissa
From: rissa@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Patricia O Tuama)
Newsgroups: news.groups,rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: REC.ARTS.CINEMA -- drawing the discussion to a close?
Message-ID: <10938@attctc.Dallas.TX.US>
Date: 11 Jan 90 09:34:46 GMT
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: Lone Star Cafe
Lines: 15

In article <50608@bbn.COM> rshapiro@bbn.com writes:
>2. Should the group be moderated or not? Moderated, definitely. I
>haven't heard any good arguments against.

Richard, you have heard plenty of good arguments against moderating
this or any other rec.* group including several from me.  You came 
into this discussion determined to have a moderated group and you 
have dismissed or ignored anyone who questioned or protested your 
decision.  

Now that's certainly your right but you are wrong when you say that 
no one has presented good, solid reasons as to why this newsgroup 
should not be moderated.  Certainly from my point of view you have 
yet to demonstrate why it -should- be moderated -- all of your rea-
sons are based entirely on conjecture.