Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!texbell!vector!holston!barton
From: barton@holston.UUCP (Barton A. Fisk)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION:  comp.binaries.os2
Summary: talk about redundant!
Message-ID: <5661@holston.UUCP>
Date: 11 Jan 90 21:37:22 GMT
References: <5942@ncar.ucar.edu> <1990Jan9.154132.9895@mks.com>
Organization: Barton A. Fisk & Co.
Lines: 12

In article <1990Jan9.154132.9895@mks.com>, andy@mks.com (Andy Toy) writes:
> 
> Why don't we just use comp.binaries.ibm.pc?  They are binaries and
> they run on a IBM PC (o.k. may it should comp.binaries.ibm.ps2 :-).  
> 
I second that...this is just plain needless. Let's get a grip on
redundant over-zealous newsgroup creation.
-- 
Barton A. Fisk          | UUCP: {attctc,texbell}vector!holston!barton
PO Box 1781             | (PSEUDO) DOMAIN: barton@holston.UUCP     
Lake Charles, La. 70602 | ----------------------------------------
318-439-5984            | "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone"-JC