Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!clyde.concordia.ca!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!rutgers!mcnc!ecsvax.uncecs.edu!uncmed!calico!unccab
From: unccab@calico.med.unc.edu (Charles Balan)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Call for discussion:  soc.history
Message-ID: <113@uncmed.med.unc.edu>
Date: 12 Jan 90 17:20:58 GMT
References: <2840561048@lewis.crd.ge.com>
Sender: news@uncmed.med.unc.edu
Reply-To: unccab@uncmed.med.unc.edu (Charles Balan)
Organization: UNC-CH School of Medicine
Lines: 26

In article <2840561048@lewis.crd.ge.com> welty@lewis.crd.ge.com (richard welty) writes:
>
>i can see a vague case for talk.history, but i think the case
>for soc.history is a bit stronger.

 Okay, richard - you air hole!, why not put it in talk history...I mean
 are we gonna talk about history or just participate in it...I mean
 soc.history is all well and good while we have history to socialize in,
 but what happens after the entire eastern block goes Wall Street and South
 and Central America becomes a 'burb of Texas?  Then we will _have_ to have a 
 renaming of all of the soc.history.* groups to talk.history.* since we won't 
 have anything of historical significance happening!!!  C'mon, get an input!

All of the assorted fishie.flames to you!!!!  Nyaaah! Phhtttthhh!  AAckk!

:-)  It was a j-j-joke, son!   (Why do I feel mischevious today?)

>
>richard




                            Charles Balan
UNCCAB@med.unc.edu   ,    UNCCAB@uncmed.uucp    ,   UNCCAB@unc.bitnet
%%%%%%%%%%%%%  A Witty Saying Proves Nothing - Voltaire  %%%%%%%%%%%%