Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!samsung!usc!chaph.usc.edu!phakt.usc.edu!tli
From: tli@phakt.usc.edu (Tony Li)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Call for discussion: comp.sys.cisco
Keywords: comp.sys.cisco, brouters, etc.
Message-ID: <7367@chaph.usc.edu>
Date: 13 Jan 90 07:41:28 GMT
References: <7344@chaph.usc.edu> <3165@zehntel.UUCP>
Sender: news@chaph.usc.edu
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 18

In article <3165@zehntel.UUCP> deb@zehntel.UUCP (Deborah Heller) writes:
       A news group to discuss brouters, repeaters, protocol converters, etc.
       would be a good idea.  However, I object to the idea that we start a
       news group by concentrating on only one vendor's products.  Instead,
       the group could be used as a place to discuss this class of products
       from any vendor.  If the slant happens to wander towards cisco, so be
       it...
    
I would think that BOTH groups are a good idea.  The specialized group
for discussing the particular vendor's products, the general group for
broader subjects.  Currently, this traffic is in comp.dcom.lans, which
isn't entirely appropriate.  Anyone with a better suggestion?
comp.dcom.hardware? 

Tony Li - USC Computer Science Department
Internet: tli@usc.edu Uucp: usc!tli
Thus spake the master programmer: "A well written program is its own
heaven; a poorly-written program its own hell."