Xref: utzoo alt.flame:14102 news.groups:16366 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!wuarchive!texbell!vector!attctc!rissa From: rissa@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Patricia O Tuama) Newsgroups: alt.flame,news.groups Subject: Re: Cancellation and Suspicion Message-ID: <10979@attctc.Dallas.TX.US> Date: 14 Jan 90 05:42:04 GMT Followup-To: alt.flame Organization: Lone Star Cafe Lines: 19 In article jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell) writes: >That posting could only be considered malicious if there had been no >air of hanky-panky during the con.aquaria vote. Since there was, my >posting was quite reasonable. No, your posting wasn't reasonable, Jeff. Not at all -- even if you could prove the assertion you are making here, it was malicious behav- ior on your part to have given into hTom Rounds' hysteria especially given that you've been on the net long enough to know that what he was saying was utter nonsense. >Yeah, but you shouldn't call poor Richard that. Even if he does >use "irregardless". Richard isn't Daffy, dear. But I must compliment you on the level of merriment you have excited amongst many of our fellow netters. My mailbox has been ringing all day with people rolling on the floor in hysterical laughter at your misinterpretation.