Xref: utzoo sci.philosophy.tech:1917 alt.individualism:2160 news.groups:16373 talk.philosophy.misc:3434 talk.politics.misc:41158 talk.politics.theory:4556
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!novavax!twwells!bill
From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech,alt.individualism,news.groups,talk.philosophy.misc,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.theory
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.philosophy.objectivism
Keywords: Objectivism, Rand, newsgroup, moderated/unmoderated
Message-ID: <1990Jan14.125741.18420@twwells.com>
Date: 14 Jan 90 12:57:41 GMT
References: <1990Jan13.140242.14111@twwells.com> <9001132357.AA18208@apee.ogi.edu> <1990Jan14.074050.18580@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: None, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Lines: 16

In article <1990Jan14.074050.18580@Neon.Stanford.EDU> dschein@Neon.Stanford.EDU (Dinah B. Schein) writes:
:       I have been a reader of sci.philosophy.tech for some time now, but
: have never posted.  The recent proposal to create a moderated newsgroup for
: Objectivism made me decide to post.  I will most emphatically vote against
: the _moderated_ newsgroup for the same reasons as Mehul Dave.  An unmoderated
: newsgroup is what is needed.

Followups to my original message were directed to news.groups,
since that is where these kinds of discussions are supposed to be
held. So have followups to this one.

I'll answer objections there, not here.

---
Bill                    { uunet | novavax | ankh } !twwells!bill
bill@twwells.com