Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!rutgers!att!cbnews!military From: chidsey@smoke.brl.mil (Irving Chidsey) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: Low tech warfare Message-ID: <12767@cbnews.ATT.COM> Date: 4 Jan 90 04:25:02 GMT References: <12539@cbnews.ATT.COM> <12572@cbnews.ATT.COM> Sender: military@cbnews.ATT.COM Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD. Lines: 46 Approved: military@att.att.com From: Irving Chidsey In article <12572@cbnews.ATT.COM> jhamilto@ics.UCI.EDU (John Scott Hamilton) writes: < < bxr307@csc.anu.oz writes: <[Much fine argument deleted] <> <>I was not so much interested in what the US learnt politically as what <>it had learnt militarily. We have been seeing for the last 15 years that <>the US government failed to learn any real lessons from it Vietnam experience. <>What I was trying to find out was whether the US Army in particular, and the <>rest of the US military in general, had learnt any *tactical* lessons from <>Vietnam. <