Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!BROWNVM!ST402711 From: ST402711@BROWNVM.BITNET (Tim Johnson) Newsgroups: bit.listserv.allmusic Subject: Re: time and time again Message-ID: Date: 5 Feb 90 21:27:48 GMT Sender: Discussions on all forms of Music Reply-To: Discussions on all forms of Music Lines: 31 Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM Gateway >You can start to read a >book, stop for a length of time (days perhaps) and then continue reading... >Try stopping a song in the middle, and starting it up again a couple of days >later. > HD This is probably only the result of memory. That is, we have a better memory for literature than we do for music. Thus it is easier to recall the thread. However, if I quit in the middle of a sentence or paragraph, it is very hard to pick up again at the next word and continue later. I can only do this by backing up, rereading the sentence from the start, and recalling the flow of the story. Furthermore, I would suggest that with writers for whom the language and wording is as much a part of the work as the actual "plot," it is *much* more difficult to pick up in the middle and continue. The distinction is further blurred as most of the songs described on this board last only 5 minutes or so. I can certainly start at the second movement of a symphony, recalling the first movement mentally, (y'know, major themes and such) and pick it up and enjoy it, much the same way I would pick up a book and continue from chapter 2. (In fact, I am part of a group that gets together to introduce each other to classical works once a month or so. For symphonies, because of time limitations, we generally only sample a single movement. While it is not the same as hearing the whole symphony, it is similar to reading a chapter from a book.) I think that the similarities between time and sequence in music and literature are striking. It is only our memory for music vs. literature, and the comparative scale of music vs. literature which leads to an erroneous distinction between the two. So there! :-) -Tim