Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!KEAN!BEWING
From: bewing@KEAN.UCS.MUN.CA
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.disarm-l
Subject: nuke targets
Message-ID: <0002030@leif.mun.ca>
Date: 4 Feb 90 03:06:00 GMT
Sender: Disarmament Discussion List <DISARM-L@ALBNYVM1>
Reply-To: Disarmament Discussion List <DISARM-L@ALBNYVM1>
Lines: 23
Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM Gateway
X-Vms-To: BITNET%"disarm-l@albnyvm1"

What is a legitimate target for a nuclear attack?

Military ?

Industry?

Government?

Urban centres?

Agricultural areas?

Hydro installations?

Nuclear power plants?

Given the destructive power that would be unleashed even if
only 3-5% of the missles made contact with the target IMO
there are an excess of missles already in existence and any
and all of the nuke powers could begin to reduce without the
fear of being invaded/attacked by another nuke power.

Bob