Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!BROWNVM!PH408014 From: PH408014@BROWNVM.BITNET (Tim Johnson) Newsgroups: bit.listserv.disarm-l Subject: Re: challenging versus attacking Message-ID: Date: 4 Feb 90 18:04:38 GMT Sender: Disarmament Discussion List Reply-To: Disarmament Discussion List Lines: 20 Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM Gateway >Can you give an example of a challenge versus an attack? > >Dave Sure, Dave. How 'bout this: Geeze Dave, you really are an idiot. How someone could come up with such a hare-brained notion is beyond me. Clearly you are the victim of some sort of self-delusion. Well, Dave, the problem with that argument is that your source is hardly disinterested, and may well be distorting the facts. But even if you accept that source, it is not self-evident how you make the leap from such-and-such fact to such-and-such conclusion. Etc... I'll let you guess which is more acceptable. -Tim