Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!NIHCU!RAF
From: RAF@NIHCU.BITNET (Roger Fajman)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Subject: Re:  ROUTTAB explanation.  Warning:  long text
Message-ID: <NODMGT-L%90020123555352@BITNIC.BITNET>
Date: 2 Feb 90 04:50:17 GMT
Sender: Node Management Discussion <NODMGT-L@BITNIC>
Reply-To: Node Management Discussion <NODMGT-L@BITNIC>
Lines: 4
Approved: NETNEWS@PSUVM Gateway
Comments: To: PASCH@DHDIBM1.BITNET

Makes a lot of sense to me, Bert.  Just one quibble.  I thought that I
heard others say that all versions of RSCS use the same routing table
format.  If that's true, there's no reason for Vn in the :routtab tag.
Or are they really different?