Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!TECMTYVM!POSTMAST
From: POSTMAST@TECMTYVM.BITNET (Juan M. Courcoul)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Subject: Re: 9002 BITNET LINKS reposted -ignore the last one is correct.
Message-ID: <NODMGT-L%90020319290054@MARIST.BITNET>
Date: 3 Feb 90 00:40:56 GMT
Sender: Node Management Discussion <NODMGT-L@BITNIC>
Reply-To: Node Management Discussion <NODMGT-L@BITNIC>
Lines: 9
Approved: NETNEWS@PSUVM Gateway
In-Reply-To:  Message of Fri, 2 Feb 90 10:30:44 EST

Being that the BITNET NODELST file available on all NETSERVs is really the
BITNET LINKS file, can we assume that the proper steps have been taken to
store the correct version on the NETSERVs ? I recall that Ulrich Giese had
found the first version stored to be in error, lacking the GULFNET nodes.

Thanks,

Juan Courcoul
Mexico Netserv Controller