Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!HNYKUN11!U001213
From: U001213@HNYKUN11.BITNET (Hans-Ulrich Giese)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Subject: Re: 9002 BITNET LINKS reposted -ignore the last one is correct.
Message-ID: <NODMGT-L%90020507534427@HEARN>
Date: 5 Feb 90 06:51:45 GMT
Sender: Node Management Discussion <NODMGT-L@BITNIC>
Reply-To: Node Management Discussion <NODMGT-L@BITNIC>
Lines: 13
Approved: NETNEWS@PSUVM Gateway
In-Reply-To:  Message of Fri, 2 Feb 90 20:40:56 EDT from <POSTMAST@TECMTYVM>

On Fri, 2 Feb 90 20:40:56 EDT Juan M. Courcoul said:
>Being that the BITNET NODELST file available on all NETSERVs is really the
>BITNET LINKS file, can we assume that the proper steps have been taken to
>store the correct version on the NETSERVs ? I recall that Ulrich Giese had
>found the first version stored to be in error, lacking the GULFNET nodes.

juan,
i'm  in direct contact with BITNIC. i hope the problems with BITNET NODELST
will be solved today (i.e. monday).
-ulrich-

p.s.: please note that the updates for BITEARN NODES (9002) will be distributed
      as soon as the mentioned problems are solved (i hope this evening).