Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!UNTVAX!IF94 From: IF94@UNTVAX.BITNET Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell Subject: RE: Problems with CAPTURE Message-ID: Date: 6 Feb 90 04:05:00 GMT Sender: Novell LAN Interest Group Reply-To: Novell LAN Interest Group Lines: 21 Approved: NETNEWS@PSUVM Gateway X-VMS-To: IN%"novell@suvm.bitnet" Comments: Warning -- RSCS tag indicates an origin of IF94@NTSUVAXB Path: ntvaxb!if94 From: if94@vaxb.acs.unt.edu Newsgroups: novell Subject: RE: Problems with CAPTURE Message-ID: <19522.25ce0694@vaxb.acs.unt.edu> Date: 5 Feb 90 23:04:52 GMT References: <19427.25c9f826@vaxb.acs.unt.edu> Lines: 12 In article <19427.25c9f826@vaxb.acs.unt.edu>, Keith Ostertag writes: > I have been told by my local reseller that the 2.15 shell doesn't work > properly with CAPTURE and that I should use the 2.11 shell instead. > Anybody else have problems with CAPTURE and 2.15? We've never had a problem with the CAPTURE command. We are running SFT/Advanced Netware 2.15; and even with a stand-alone version of WordPerfect (ver 4.2) TI=4 we have never had a problem with CAPTURE. (****--->Timothy.