Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!WVNVM!U0A61
From: U0A61@WVNVM.BITNET (Bryan, Jerry)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.policy-l
Subject: Letter of the law
Message-ID: <POLICY-L%90020415241114@UGA.BITNET>
Date: 4 Feb 90 20:24:35 GMT
Sender: Discussion about BITNET policies <POLICY-L@BITNIC>
Reply-To: Discussion about BITNET policies <POLICY-L@BITNIC>
Lines: 6
Approved: NETNEWS@PSUVM Gateway
X-Acknowledge-To: <U0A61@WVNVM>
In-Reply-To:  Message of 02/04/90 at 12:27:44 from ROBINSON@BITNIC.BITNET

>I believe that at the August 1989 BITTECH meeting it was agreed that
>9.6k links were the MINIMUM standard.  BITNIC itself has a 56k link
>to UMD, so I hope that's the case.

Is it therefore clear that an acceptable substitute for 9.6k
would be a VMNET link?