Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!ETSU!CMS2
From: CMS2@ETSU.BITNET (Bill Williams)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.vmxa-l
Subject: Re: R2.1
Message-ID: <900205.181814.EST.CMS2@ETSU>
Date: 5 Feb 90 23:18:14 GMT
Sender: VM/XA Discussion List <VMXA-L@UGA>
Reply-To: VM/XA Discussion List <VMXA-L@UGA>
Organization: East Tennessee State University
Lines: 18
Approved: NETNEWS@PSUVM Gateway
In-Reply-To:  Message of Fri, 2 Feb 90 11:04:46 EST from <URMM@MARIST>

On Fri, 2 Feb 90 11:04:46 EST Martha McConaghy said:
>>This is interesting.  Just for the sake of "how bout this" to those who
>>have not experienced SP R6... Maintenance of certain components relies on
>>the SFS -- TSAF, GCS, VTAM just to name 3 off the top of my head.
>
>You're kidding, aren't you???  They are really using SFS for maintenance???!!!

Martha, would I kid about a thing like this?

I haven't had much to do with the SP6 system -- I just installed it and
have not made any extensive trials of the pros & cons of SFS.  (I've got
SP5 on my "real" system over here.)

Without judging bugs factor or performance index, I am happy with the
*idea* of a SFS available; I could certainly use one over here on SP5
for certain special archives, etc.
----------
    B.R.Wms