Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!mintaka!ogicse!ucsd!nosc!crash!simpact!jeh From: jeh@simpact.com Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: UUCP G protocol and time/file limits Message-ID: <890.25c97988@simpact.com> Date: 2 Feb 90 20:14:00 GMT References: Followup-To: comp.mail.uucp Organization: Simpact Associates, San Diego CA Lines: 13 In article , mshiels@tmsoft.uucp (Michael A. Shiels) writes: > Are there any SAFE responses to a 'S x x x' command which will have the > other system keep the file and try it again when things free up.... I'd like to know this too. And, if there isn't such a response, there ought to be! Can we assign one? --- Jamie Hanrahan, Simpact Associates, San Diego CA Chair, VMSnet [DECUS uucp] and Internals Working Groups, DECUS VAX Systems SIG -------------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Internet: jeh@simpact.com, | Future shock: A sense of bewilderment or if that fails, jeh@crash.cts.com | felt by those who were not paying Uucp: ...{crash,decwrl}!simpact!jeh | attention. -- Analog (Jan 90)