Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!lightning.cis.ufl.edu!bcs
From: bcs@lightning.cis.ufl.edu (Bradley C. Spatz)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: Useless busywork
Message-ID: <22059@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>
Date: 2 Feb 90 22:03:27 GMT
References: <9785@nigel.udel.EDU>
Sender: news@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU
Reply-To: bcs@lightning.cis.ufl.edu (Bradley C. Spatz)
Organization: UF CIS Department
Lines: 15

In article <9785@nigel.udel.EDU> Dickson@system-m.phx.bull.com (Paul Dickson) writes:
>I can't see how the Referee'd approach would work?
>In my opinion, a better way to split comp.os.minix would be to add two other
>groups.  One would be moderated and would one have the defacto updates to
>Minix.  The other would be a general sources so others can test various
>versions and bug fixes, keeping comp.os.minix free for discussions only.

I agree wholeheartedly.  Separate groups is the way to go in my opinion.  In
fact, I have been surprised that sources, updates, and discussions have
occurred in the same group.
--
Bradley C. Spatz                                         Internet:  bcs@ufl.edu
Computer and Information Sciences                          BITNET:  spatz@uffsc
College of Engineering
University of Florida                  "School IS hell" -- Matt Groening