Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!alberta!dvinci!weyr!p1.f11.n372.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Randy.Harner
From: Randy.Harner@p1.f11.n372.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Randy Harner)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2
Subject: Speculation
Message-ID: <459.25CC1EFB@weyr.FIDONET.ORG>
Date: 2 Feb 90 04:56:23 GMT
Sender: ufgate@weyr.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:372/11.1 - Randy's House, Summerville SC
Lines: 16

In a message to All <31 Jan 90 10:46:00> Dave Chatfield wrote:

 DC> In a typical mixed OS/2 and DOS IBM LAN Server environment (yes,
 DC> mine is a good example), I'm curious about OS/2 2.0's effect on
 DC> other stations on the LAN.

How well does it perform ? What kind of thruput are you getting ?

                                                                  


--  
Randy Harner - via FidoNet node 1:140/22
UUCP: alberta!dvinci!weyr!372!11.1!Randy.Harner
Internet: Randy.Harner@p1.f11.n372.z1.FIDONET.ORG
Standard Disclaimers Apply...