Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!samsung!think!mintaka!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!alberta!dvinci!weyr!p1.f491.n141.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Vince.Perriello
From: Vince.Perriello@p1.f491.n141.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Vince Perriello)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2
Subject: Gating -- I vote YES.
Message-ID: <473.25CC1F67@weyr.FIDONET.ORG>
Date: 2 Feb 90 15:06:49 GMT
Sender: ufgate@weyr.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:141/491.1 - Naugy Net, Naugatuck CT
Lines: 11

Originally, I didn't feel that the experiment would be worthwhile. I have changed my mind. The additional Usenet header data doesn't bother me (I would guess that there is Fidonet stuff on the other side too) and I like having access to more grey matter.

This conference is here for the dissemination of technical information and other minutiae about OS/2. The more people we have in this conference to provide this information, the more of it we'll be disseminating.

I strongly believe that the gating should continue.

--  
Vince Perriello - via FidoNet node 1:140/22
UUCP: alberta!dvinci!weyr!141!491.1!Vince.Perriello
Internet: Vince.Perriello@p1.f491.n141.z1.FIDONET.ORG
Standard Disclaimers Apply...