Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ICO.ISC.COM!dougm
From: dougm@ICO.ISC.COM ("Doug McCallum")
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re(2): tcp/ip for 386 UNIX
Message-ID: <9002031747.AA20831@violet.ICO.ISC.COM>
Date: 3 Feb 90 17:47:30 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 12

In reply to your message of 3 Feb 90 00:22:02 GMT
-------
> In article <1990Feb2.154728.17877@ico.isc.com>, dougm@ico.isc.com (Doug McCallum) writes:
> > In article <1990Feb1.052144.27172@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us> johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us (John R. Levine) writes:
> > ...
> > AT&T's TCP/IP is based on the Wollongong port and not the Lachman port.

> In which release ?  SVR4 is definitely the Convergent/Lachmann port.

SVR3.  SVR4 is only barely out the door and is only available to a small
handful of people.  THe discussion was about currently shipping 386
based UNIX systems.