Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!mintaka!ogicse!ucsd!nosc!humu!pegasus!richard From: richard@pegasus.uucp (Richard Foulk) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: Paying for Shareware (Was: Re: v09i070: newsclip 1.1...) Message-ID: <1990Feb2.194315.3924@pegasus.uucp> Date: 2 Feb 90 19:43:15 GMT References: <137@sneezy.tcom.stc.co.uk> <15398@well.UUCP> <1134@utoday.UUCP> <13011@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> <3032@netxcom.DHL.COM> <13742@s.ms.uky.edu> <7146.25c595d1@dit.ie> <13912@s.ms.uky.edu> <1201@utoday.UUCP> Reply-To: richard@pegasus.UUCP (Richard Foulk) Organization: Pegasus, Honolulu Lines: 36 > >I would like to think that, eventually, the improper usage of shareware, >that is, the usage of shareware against the license agreement, would be >viewed as if the user were one of those spitting on the sidewalk: vulgar, >crass, anti-social, and disgusting. > Shareware has no license agreement (legal contract) involved. No signature -- no contract. If both sides don't benefit then there's no legal contract. When a package comes across the net it's mine to use already -- so I gain nothing through such an agreement. So the shareware hucksters are the anti-social and disgusting ones for foisting their scam on the rest of us. A request for a donation is fine by me, and I'll pay it if I like the software enough. A demand is not okay. I have no respect for the sleaze-balls that lie to your face and try to coerce you to send them money on false pretenses. If anyone wants to start a fund to sue one of these jerks as an example, please contact me, I'll contribute. An injunction against the "you must pay" notices would be enough. I get the impression that they think if they spread their scam around enough, and say "it's the law" enough, and create an association... That somehow they'll become legitimate; that the laws will just have to change to suit their new reality. -- Richard Foulk richard@pegasus.uucp richard%pegasus.uucp@nosc.mil richard@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu