Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!think!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!mephisto!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!mcsun!ukc!tcdcs!swift.cs.tcd.ie!ccvax.ucd.ie!h236_014 From: h236_014@ccvax.ucd.ie Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: TURBO C/MAS problem Message-ID: <523.25cd9dcc@ccvax.ucd.ie> Date: 5 Feb 90 15:37:48 GMT References: <7896@shlump.nac.dec.com> <2010@atari.UUCP> Organization: University College Dublin Lines: 45 In article <2010@atari.UUCP>, kbad@atari.UUCP (Ken Badertscher) writes: > gilliam@lowlif.dec.com writes: > > | Is the documentation in English? Does it have a GEM interface? If so, are > | the dialogues in English? I was under the impression that an English > | language version of Turbo C for the ST is not available. > > The version I use has German documentation and help files, but English > text in the menus, dialogs and compiler error messages. Version 1.1, > the one currently available from Borland in Germany, comes with a GEM > based shell which includes the compiler and linker and a decent editor. > It also includes .TTP versions of the compiler, linker and librarian. > An assembler and debugger are available seperately. > > The online help is eminently useful, even though I don't read German > very well (about one semester worth of study, many years ago). The > reason it is so useful is that it gives you function prototypes and > associated information in a "hypertext" style format, where you can > click on highlighted cross references in the help window for further > information. > > People who are interested in an English language version of the package > should definitely contact Borland and let their voices be heard. As > I've mentioned in previous posts, this is a fine development system. > Despite some quirks, it's really fast and generates excellent code. > It deserves to be seen in English speaking markets, but that won't > happen unless and until Borland perceives a market for it. > > -- > ||| Ken Badertscher (ames!atari!kbad) > ||| Atari R&D System Software Engine > / | \ #include Does anybody know how similar the ST and PC versions of the compiler are ? The reason I ask is that I have Turbo C v1.5 for the PC and if the two versions were similar I might be able to make do with the PC manual for all the UN*X-like stuff and only be forced onto the German manual for the GEM/ST specific stuff. I would naturally prefer an English version on Turbo C but might be left waiting for a long time. Any information would be appreciated, Padraig.